Well, it's very difficult to have
'comprehensive' without 'complex', unless you are prepared to
write your own models, or add real-life parameters to existing
simpler models.
On 2024-12-22 15:29, Tom via groups.io
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 10:17 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
What I mean is that there are few real-life BIBO
opamps,from which SPICE models with real-life features, such
as offset and PSRR could be produced.
The BIBO models from TI are incredibly complex. They model
lot of parameters.
******************************************************
* AC PARAMETERS
**********************
* CLOSED-LOOP OUTPUT IMPEDANCE VS. FREQUENCY (Zout vs. Freq.)
* CLOSED-LOOP GAIN AND PHASE VS. FREQUENCY WITH RL, CL EFFECTS
(Acl vs. Freq.)
* COMMON-MODE REJECTION RATIO VS. FREQUENCY (CMRR vs. Freq.)
* POWER SUPPLY REJECTION RATIO VS. FREQUENCY (PSRR vs. Freq.)
* INPUT VOLTAGE NOISE DENSITY VS. FREQUENCY (en vs. Freq.)
**********************
* DC PARAMETERS
**********************
* INPUT COMMON-MODE VOLTAGE RANGE (Vcm)
* GAIN ERROR (Eg)
* INPUT BIAS CURRENT VS. INPUT COMMON-MODE VOLTAGE (Ib vs. Vcm)
* INPUT OFFSET VOLTAGE VS. TEMPERATURE (Vos vs. Temp)
* OUTPUT VOLTAGE SWING vs. OUTPUT CURRENT (Vout vs. Iout)
* SHORT-CIRCUIT OUTPUT CURRENT (Isc)
* QUIESCENT CURRENT (Iq)
**********************
* TRANSIENT PARAMETERS
**********************
* SLEW RATE (SR)
* SETTLING TIME VS. CAPACITIVE LOAD (ts)
* OVERLOAD RECOVERY TIME (tor)
******************************************************
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best Wishes
John Woodgate
Keep trying
John Woodgate
