having just been searching for a "copper-less" USB fiber optic connection (precisely for this sort of antenna testing application at work): they aren't easy to come by, and are kind of expensive ($900). You'll see lots of inexpensive AOC (Active Optical Cable) USB over fiber cables, but they have a couple copper conductors to provide power to the "far" end of the cable.
Optical serial port, or optical Ethernet are *much* easier to come by.
I've used a beaglebone green wireless to get remote USB access to a device, and also a Rpi. It's kind of clunky to be sure, but it does work, because you're doing two hops - your PC/Mac to the remote processor via IP network (WiFi) and then through the device.
And you've got to get power to the processor (battery works).
Since the NanoVNA has serial access (via a couple of pads on the board) that might be the easiest way.
I'd assume you'd use some sort of program (I use NanoVNA-Saver, but there's various other apps) to control the NanoVNA, so it's not like you need to see the screen.
переключити цитоване повідомлення
Показати цитований текст
-----Original Message-----
From: <nanovna-users@groups.io>
Sent: Dec 2, 2024 11:31 AM
To: <nanovna-users@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] USB isolator suggestions?
Use a laptop, use a BT to serial or WiFi to serial adaptor.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 20:26, Brent DeWitt via groups.io
wrote:
Measuring balanced antenna feeds with the nano is easy if it is not connected to anything and well decoupled from "ground". It would be nice to remove the influence of connecting a USB cable to a PC so NanoVNA Saver can be used. I see two possible solutions:
- a wideband RF 1:1 transformer on the S11 port
- USB isolation of the RF path to ground
The nice thing about USB isolation is that it should be possible to make it generically broadband and there are lots of isolators out there cheap. As one might expect, none of the inexpensive products (not fiber optic) say anything about parasitic capacitance on the ground side. Does anyone on this list have good/bad experiences with specific brands and models that show low coupling in the 3 to 30 MHz region?
failing that, I'm thinking the RF transformer may be the best way to go.
All thoughts welcomed!
Brent, AB1LF