Re: LED Machine Lighting Sale

 

You're lucky - the closest one to me is in Gillette, WY, which is almost 600 miles away.


Re: LED Machine Lighting Sale

 

Thankfully I have a Menards about 30 miles from me that I pass by often so I had mine shipped to the store for free.


Re: LED Machine Lighting Sale

 

Unfortunately. the shipping (for 4 units) is as much as the cost of the items.


LED Machine Lighting Sale

 

Menards (in the USA) today had the flexible LED goose neck lights on sale (7W) for $3.99 each. I just ordered 20 of them for my shop equipment. They are selling fast so I thought I would pass it along in case come one here is looking for equipment lighting..
 
https://www.menards.com/main/lighting-ceiling-fans/indoor-lighting/lamps/table-lamps/flexible-gooseneck-led-lamp/68769g/p-1642874340851661-c-7497.htm


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

I have purchased all but one time the longest.
 
The reason is very simple space. In retirement you could find a location may not have room for bigger lathes  so decide on a  8" x 14" and can do milling too. It will fit in a 36" Aumawal or weight like on a install field pickup 🚚/boat 🛥/airplane 🛬 maybe for class room ♜ 
 
Dave 


Grizzly G4003 - modifications to RideTheGearTrain software to accommodate this lathe #lead-screw #threading

 

Grizzly G4003 Lathe-modifications to RideTheGearTrain

(free online to calculate the change gears needed to cut a thread.


I had quite a busy time in the days leading up to Christmas. I had contacts from a couple of people who needed their lathe gearboxes added to the program (RideTheGearTrain).  One lathe had crazy features I had not heard of before. It was a Chinese-made Grizzly G4003 (2005) model sold by the American Grizzly company.

 

The spindle shaft is 16mm and the leadscrew shaft is 19mm, so they have two sets of change gears. This meant that I had to modify the program to handle it.  It would have been a huge job to re-write the whole program, but not long ago I added a filter system. The user enters ALL their change gears initially, but they also click the button, currently labeled "Exclude Large gears", and here the user can enter a separate list of gears permitted for each position (or stud) in the gear train. If the program produces results with gears that are NOT permitted in any position, those results are deleted (filtered out) and only the reduced list of results is displayed.  

 

I added this filtering system a few months ago to prevent the display of results where a gear is too large to fit on the machine. A user had this problem.  So the user enters a size limit (by number of teeth) for any position they want restricted.  For example on some lathes there is a casting near the stud gear that prevents large gears from being fitted. If the size limit for the stud gear is 60 teeth, then the user enters 60 as the maximum size for the stud gear. Results using larger gears are filtered out.

 

An advancement on this idea was to actually measure the distance between studs on the banjo, and from the DP (Diametral Pitch of the gears) the size of gears can be calculated.  When there are gears on two 'studs' (or shafts) on the banjo, the radius of each gear is proportional to the number of teeth on that gear. The space required is the sum of the two radii. We can use the sum of the teeth on the two gears and from that calculate whether the two gears will fit between the two studs. If they don't fit, the filter program will remove the results from the list of results to be displayed.

 

This method is rather complicated and I doubt whether anyone uses it. I haven't had any feedback about it. I did not have my Boxford in Tennessee when I wrote this. Now I am in New Zealand I could measure my lathe and see if it works. It probably isn't foolproof because fitting one pair of large gears on the banjo will limit how much room is available for the next pair. We could add up the teeth of ALL the gears on the gear train, but that would only work if the gears are arranged in s straight line, which they are not. Some more thought may be required.

 

Going back to the weird Grizzly lathe, it has another quirk.  It is fitted with a 91/86 compound pair for imperial to metric conversion.  It is designed in such a way that this gear cannot be flipped over. RideTheGearTrain automatically tries flipping over compound pairs and it is quite surprising to me that it produces nearly as many results with the conversion gear flipped.  A conversion gear with a ratio approximating 1.27 is fairly close to 1.25 which happens to be quite handy!  So, how can we prevent RideTheGearTrain from displaying results with this gear flipped?  Easy. Just use the filter system to tell the program to filter out any results where the gear in position Compound 2 (comp2) is larger than 87. 

 

Now with this filter system we can accommodate this peculiar lathe.  Now I understand better why it is done this way. The gears designed to go on the leadscrew shaft have a long extended boss on one side - like a built-in spacer. If you put it with the spaced to the right, the gear engages with the metric conversion gear. If you flip the leadscrew gear over, so that the spacer is on the left, it now meshes with the gear on the compound pair which acts as an idler. This is used for cutting imperial threads. These leadscrew gears with the extensions cannot be used as stud gears.  So, this lathe comes with two of these leadscrew gears and 6 change gears for the stud gear position.

 

 

Now comes the question, why do they use a 91/86 compound pair.  The gear ratio is 1.058139534883721   The answer can be found if you click the button labelled 'Metric-Imperial Conversion' (which I described in a previous post but now we have a real world application).  There you will find a table produced from an equation I derived.  

 

I used PhotoShop to make a copy of this table as a JPEG file (.jpg) but groups.io says "Dropped file type is not supported"!  What!  So I tried JPEG2000, and finally loaded .PNG but get the same message. Whether you get it is a matter of luck!) I wonder if the message is too long.

 

 

R= 25.4 / (Li * Lm)

 

 

The Grizzly lathe has an 8 TPI imperial leadscrew, so look down the column marked 8TPI. You will find a ratio that is very similar: 1.0583333. The difference between these numbers is incredibly small at 0.0183%.  Now look across this row where it says 3mm.  What does this mean?  Well, it means that this gear combination will convert an 8TPI leadscrew to behave like a good French metric leadscrew with a pitch of 3mm (just like the metric Boxford).  In the above equation Li is the TPI of the imperial leadscrew, and Lm is the pitch of the metric leadscrew.  What if they had used the standard conversion gear 127/100 with its ratio of 1.27.  You can see from this table that it makes an 8TPI leadscrew behave like a 2.5mm metric leadscrew.  

 

If you want to use RideTheGearTrain to find a suitable compound pair for any application, you can enter the ratio (scroll down to the bottom of the page). The program then produces a list of gear sizes that will approximate this ratio. If we enter 1.0583333 as in the above example, it displays a long list of compound pairs that you could use. Alongside each pair you see the amount of error produced. The smallest errors are displayed in red. Now scroll down this list to find the smallest error. Guess what! The smallest error is for the conversion gear 91/86 with -0.0183% error!  That is the best choice.

 

Merry Christmas and happy New Year

 

Evan Lewis

Lathe: 1955 Boxford Model A with screw cutting gearbox, power feed with several accessories, hand tools and a pillar drill press.
Try my Free Online Gear train Software:https://RideTheGearTrain.com
You enter a thread pitch or TPI and it shows you a range of gear trains and gearbox setting to use and even a scale drawing of the gear train.
It also includes calculations for taper turning by the tailstock offset method, and cutting speeds.
It includes the specifications for many thread types eg metric, UNC, BSW, and BA.
Displays drill sizes for tapping threads at any percent thread depth (with full explanations).
My YouTube Channel and Playlist about using an engineers lathe:  https://www.Youtube.com/evan-e-cent
Project to build a Greek Hero steam engine and measure its power output: https://HeroSteamEngine.com


Re: Damage to electronic devices as raised about Digital Electronic Vernier Calipers.

 

In in shop was a machinist did haveva fling Damage to electronic devices as raised about Electronic Vernier Calipers and 6 hours of more work and tilling the Forman his high quality Habor Freight Electronic Vernier Caliper did not work after flying ✈ 
 
I am the Forman said that's OK  or maybe if you bring a Habor Freight Electronic Vernier Caliper junk again it is your $^%%%^ .
 
Dave 
 


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

I'm thinking that's referring to a BLDC - brushless DC motor.

The Sieg circuitry looks like it's based on a reference design for the Atmel Encoder BLDC:

http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/36/doc8138-50218.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOopBmp_L2bLYa9JeHBxrQkk83M8NM_5eBdSDc5BfXDgsj24U3sms

I think they used a different 8 bit uC but basically the same idea.

On 12/18/2024 9:08 PM, Old Boilermaker via groups.io wrote:
What is a "digital motor"? As far as I'm aware, here in Australia the C3P has a 350w brushed motor and the SC3 has a 500w brushless motor. I have not heard of anyone having to replace the brushless motor but on YouTube there are many transplanting different motors to replace the 350w one which has "smoked"





Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

What is a "digital motor"? As far as I'm aware, here in Australia the C3P has a 350w brushed motor and the SC3 has a 500w brushless motor. I have not heard of anyone having to replace the brushless motor but on YouTube there are many transplanting different motors to replace the 350w one which has "smoked"


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

Yes, original motor without any issues. Mine is the original setup prior to the current digital motor. 

Best regards
David

On 18 Dec 2024, at 11:42, flyfishingdude9 via groups.io <flyfishingdude9@...> wrote:


Roy
 
👍😂
 
Jeff


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

Roy
 
👍😂
 
Jeff


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

Wishful thinking!
 
What usually happens is you'll find a project you  really want to do that's bigger than your lathe can handle. That's apparently one of the constants of the universe😉 
 
On one (shipboard) shop I ran, the largest lathe was 54"x120" - we'd still manage to get jobs that had to be sent out to a shop with bigger machinery.
 
Roy


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

David, do you have the original motor in your lathe? Has it given you any problems?


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

So. The maximums which i would ever need to machine would be 25mm steel shafted approximately 280mm long and I would like to be able to make belt grinder pulleys from aluminium,  the largest being 100mm dia x 70 mm thick.


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

No matter which you get, I'll reccomend getting the following book:  https://secure.villagepress.com/store/items/detail/item/3874

Even if you don’t build all the improvements he lays out, it’s a really great source on how to bootstrap improvements to both your lathe and your skills. 


On Dec 16, 2024, at 2:54 AM, David Wiseman via groups.io <david@...> wrote:

I found myself in a similar situation as yourself, I had a friend who had a marvelous workshop and he would machine things for me at no cost as a friend. Sadly he passes on, só I bought a C3 and developed from there. 

But the best you can aford, more powerful motor is a nice upgrade. 

Best regards
David

On 16 Dec 2024, at 00:37, Old Boilermaker via groups.io <alned03@...> wrote:


You make some really good points so I think I need to explain my situation.  So I am a retired Boilermaker.  These days keep active by building various things in my shed. Every now and then I run into a situation where I might need a shaf to run between bearings, or a bronze bush, an aluminium pulley or a simple hinge, you get the idea. Up until now I have been either trying to buy these things off the shelf, or paying someone to machine something for me. I just thought it would be nice to have a little machine so I can do most of these tasks myself.
I am no machinist that's for sure, infact only ti.e I've even been near a lathe was in metalwork class at high school and possibly at trade school though I am competent enough to learn or at least have a go at it.

-- 
Bruce Johnson

The less a man knows about how sausages and laws are made, the easier it is to steal his vote and give him botulism.


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

Don't forget after you have bought the lathe you will need tools, cutting and measuring equipment, this can add up to quite a bit, but at least you can buy them as you need them.


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

Old Boilermaker,
 
1 - Any lathe is better than no lathe
 
2 - Buy the best that your budget allows
 
3 - Yes, a longer bed is better, and makes life a lot easier, but as said previously you can get pretty innovative with a shorter bed.  Also, working around those limitations will make you a better machinist, but be careful don't get hurt.  You do learn to think outside the box though! 😁
 
4 - As mentioned, your new toy will probably need some TLC right out of the box, but that's part of the fun!  There are tons of mods you can make, and tons of YT videos showing some of these.  My first lathe (7X14) transformed into an amazing machine.  I still have it and still use it more than my other, bigger machines.  I have a special connection with that little bad boy.
 
5 - Just keep in mind that you can make small parts on big lathe, but you can't make big parts on a small lathe.
 
Good luck with whatever you choose and have fun!  For me it's like playing golf - I'm not making any money doing it, so I just have fun.  By the way, I really suck at golf!  😂
 
Jeff


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

I also agree with a long bed idea. However, take care that the weight increases with the length. I bought a 200x400mm Weiss lathe (100 mm dia. chuck, 400mm between centers). Its weight is 65 kg. If heavier, I really had issues to install it alone !

That said, I didn't have to turn long pieces but I had to check bores with the rods that had to go inside (300mm long). Really happy to have a bed that long, avoiding to dismount the tail stock for each test !



On 16.12.24 01:46, Ryan H via groups.io wrote:

If it were me, I'd go for the longer one funds permitting.  I just managed to make a new 11 inch screw on my 7x14.  Like someone else said, length gets eaten up with a tail stock, live center, drill chuck and whatever else you may need at that end.  I got it done and it came out really nice but man, that extra two inches would have made life a lot easier.  It's easier to use less of the machine than to make it longer.  :-)


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

I found myself in a similar situation as yourself, I had a friend who had a marvelous workshop and he would machine things for me at no cost as a friend. Sadly he passes on, só I bought a C3 and developed from there. 

But the best you can aford, more powerful motor is a nice upgrade. 

Best regards
David

On 16 Dec 2024, at 00:37, Old Boilermaker via groups.io <alned03@...> wrote:


You make some really good points so I think I need to explain my situation.  So I am a retired Boilermaker.  These days keep active by building various things in my shed. Every now and then I run into a situation where I might need a shaf to run between bearings, or a bronze bush, an aluminium pulley or a simple hinge, you get the idea. Up until now I have been either trying to buy these things off the shelf, or paying someone to machine something for me. I just thought it would be nice to have a little machine so I can do most of these tasks myself.
I am no machinist that's for sure, infact only ti.e I've even been near a lathe was in metalwork class at high school and possibly at trade school though I am competent enough to learn or at least have a go at it.


Re: Sieg C3 vs SC3

 

Allen Gentz,Us boilermakers are a dying race that's for sure.