Good choice! .MEAS are useful, up to a point. Some situations demand a difference approach. -- Regards, Tony On 09/10/2023 23:34, Bell, Dave wrote:

On 19/05/2023 09:42, ak za via groups.io wrote: Real.

Thanks, Mike! I finally landed on this syntax about an hour ago, too. I knew it needed PARAM, but couldn’t see just where… Dave

On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 05:51 AM, Hanspi wrote: Hi Chris, This hack works well, thanks. However, once I write anything to files, I'd rather use a (Python) script to parse it. My hope was that it is po

Tony, Thanks for your response. The suggestion for using 0.999 of Zpk is a good one to keep in mind. Our use case for the .meas script is when processing possibly thousands of cases from Monte Carlo w

That's the problem. I don't see as well as most, so the standard dialogs, etc. in LTspice are not so visible to me. However, I discovered that when the .meas file is run, the .mout file is opened in a

Thanks, Andy! I tried PARAM, but clearly didn’t apply it correctly. Good point about noise or distortion affecting the calculated value. AVG is simpler, too! Dave

You have not got the .MEAS syntax right. Below, the corrected syntax: .meas lxvalue param lx .meas w2value param w2 .meas w3valu param w3 You need the "param" because these are declared parameters, no

Thanks, Tony and Andy! Yes, PARAM was what I needed. Now, I get: t1: v(out)=5 AT 0.000223138 t2: v(out)=5 AT 0.00072313 t3: v(out)=5 AT 0.00122275 t12: t2-t1=0.000499993 t23: t3-t2=0.000499617 t13: t3

Hi guys. Thanks for answering. I found the mistake I wrote the directive .meas ac filterq PARAMRe(cfreq/BW) instead of .meas ac filterq PARAM Re(cfreq/BW) Norberto

Thanks Andy! Cognition is hindered by our own stereotypes :-)

Thanks for the reply. Comments in the above memtioned, I just add it in the post only not in the actual command. I figured out the mistake as the gain curve is crossing 3dB below line only once, so i

Andy you hit the nail on the head. .tran takes t=0 to be the start of the simulation. .meas takes takes t=0 to be the start of the saved data Also thank you John and Vlad for taking the time to read m

if this is only because you find it difficult to measure the 90÷10 % range from the plot -- then plot u(V(Vdd)*.9-V(output)) & u(V(output)-V(Vdd)*.1) otherwise the difference of two distinct idt(1,0,<

Thanks Tony, just what I needed to know this morning... can use this infor right now. -Tim

Thank you much, Markus. I can see them. (I'm running under Wine in Linux using kchmviewer - the search feature found nothing, which surprised me; it's usually quite good.) Donald. - *Plain Text* email

Hi. You don't appreciate LTspice. It is possible to post-process the results of the scripts measure! See file MC_max_min.zip in TEMP folder. Bordodynov.

Hello Neil I'm glad it worked out for you, but there's no need to open up new threads just to thank someone. Editing the title counts as a new thread. Please do not rename the threads, there's no need

Yes, I am running the .meas script from the waveform window. Vlad was spot on with his answer. The syntax I was looking for is .meas <identifier> param <value> e.g. .meas t1 param 6.3m Neil

I think that was a character in Superman comics... Mr Meascplxfmt, no that was Mr Mxyzptlk, a bit easier to remember. Rick