https://github.com/MatKlucznyk/Qsys been using this for years and it’s been rock solid. From what I was told version 2,3,4 (not sure on 5) of the Q-SYS modules were all written by different people at

I've just swapped a program from 5.0 to 5.2; doing this cleaned up most of the errors i was getting, but still seeing this at startup: Error: splusmanagerapp.exe [App 1] # 2023-03-21 08:27:46 # Module

In a similar but different vein - trying to upgrade to 5.2 modules has been a complete bust. No connectivity to core at all. Does anyone have any prevailing wisdom that applies?

Never digged too deep for this bug, I just put a buffer on all inputs within this module, and enable the buffer by the initial input from the core module, error gone.

Just downloaded the 5.2 version, the PIN is back as a parameter and the seem to have fixed the library naming problem according to the release notes. V5.0 – Recompiled with Newtonsoft v4.0.8.0 for Cre

Those modules are not so great. I have a set of modules I wrote for qsys l. When I get home I’ll see if I can figure out how to send it your way. Cheers Natalie

I am getting the following error in the error log: 57. Error: SimplPlus[App02] # 2023-02-13 17:52:48 # Module S-2.1.2.5.2.22.2.1:S-1 : Q_SYS_Named_Control_Object_V5_0 at line 141: Unhandled Exception:

Hi All, I'm successfully using some Q-SYS module from Mathew Klucznyk and they are faster and easier to implement than the QSC certified module from Crestron. In many cases, no need to create a "named

Thanks Andy for your answer, it is crystal clear for me now. Regards.

Crestron made a breaking change with the 5.1 update. The PIN field is now a string instead of an integer. They updated the 5.1 simpl module parameters to reflect this as well as the Simpl# library, bu

Hi Group, Having some fun with Q-SYS modules version 5.0 and 5.1 that seems to be impossible to have them in the same database. After importing the 5.1 module, I was working on a system with CP4 and 5

Add an extra input you're not using and switch to the unused input.

I did not know that. This is very very helpful. Nice one Biz. Thanks -s

Hey Slip, Ignore this if you are already aware. You can put your QSys design into emulation mode, point your Crestron to your laptops IP address instead of your hardware QSC Core and then you’ll be ab

Thanks chaps. Gonna go with unused input simply as time sensitive and limited time on site to test. Regards -s

I run my own qsys modules, so my router module mutes the output when I send a 0 and then unmutes and selects the source whenever another value is sent. I'm sure you can use 2 different modules and som

If I remember correctly, dedicating and input is the only way to go as even in native q-sys world you can't clear the route. It is wiser to use input 1 as off so if your source# increases, you don't h

Anyone have any insight as to best way to switch off sources on the core? Setting a value of 0d on the Q-SYS [String - Value] V4.2 module does not turn off the source. With this in mind - Currently in