Without screen it works, with screen cleaned and reassembled, it doesn't work

I would assume you'd do a cal in NanoVNA-Saver - the idea behind the "rough wideband cal" is to make sure you're not sending data to NanoVNA-Saver that it doesn't like.

The new features being implemented for this little thing are amazing. Great work DiSlord! Q: Writing a config.ini file intrigues me, can you retrieve calibration coefficients to store in the ini file?

Ooops! Forgo the file, sorry. Doug K6HFK

Thanks for publishing your actions and results! Please seriously consider writing that up as a sort of "magazine article" and posting it in the group's Files directory. It's a lot easier to find thing

Upgraded and expanded version of the "Absolute beginner's guide to NanoVNA" v1.5 has been added to file section of this group. A detailed chapter "The firmware upgrade" has been added. As always I am

Gud to hear, Junior. John VE7KKQ yahoo.com.br@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Leighton, In your first post, you write that your firmware version is 0.2.3, which was released in early October 2019. From this, I think there are probably possible hardware bugs. What I mean? Tha

Francisco, The ttrftech reop only contains H and earlier firmware so you have no issue with installing anything from there on to your Nanovna. Hugen makes versions for H and H4 but they all have H or

Larry, I've only just been able to read the translation. Thank you for your efforts in translating this document. Sincerely, Oberschrat

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:04 AM, Dave Daniel wrote: Please desist contributing to this thread. It derves no practical purpose and consumes bandwidth that could otherwise be ised for actual development

You can set freq 299-310MHz range And see non stable work. You can remember this issue before (i made measure in this range) i can solve it by add delays and new band range, but at this moment this so